rabbit polyclonal antibodies against hmgn2 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Rabbit Polyclonal Antibodies Against Hmgn2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 15 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+polyclonal+hmgn2+antibody/pmc08335688-26-1-22?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 15 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The regulatory effect of acetylation of HMGN2 and H3K27 on pyocyanin‐induced autophagy in macrophages by affecting Ulk1 transcription"
Article Title: The regulatory effect of acetylation of HMGN2 and H3K27 on pyocyanin‐induced autophagy in macrophages by affecting Ulk1 transcription
Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16788
Figure Legend Snippet: Primer sequences for RT‐qPCR.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Sequences of primers for mutation of HMGN2.
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis
49 (A) IP showing the acetylation of lysine (ACE‐lysine) with (B) densitometric analysis showing the relative expression normalized by that of the DMSO group. (C) IP showing the HMGN2 with (D) densitometric analysis showing the relative expression normalized by the DMSO group. (E) The LC/MS mass spectrometer displaying the acetylation modification sites of HMGN2, and the amino acid sequences of HMGN2 of different species were compared and the acetylation sites were marked. NLS: nuclear localization signal domain, NBD: nucleosome binding domain and RD: regulatory domain. PM and THP‐1 cells were treated both with 50 μM PYO and with DMSO for 6 h, (F) IP HMGN2 showing the ACE‐lysine with (G) the densitometric analysis showing relative expression normalized by DMSO group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, * P < 0.05 compared with the DMSO group, n = 3 " title="... of the DMSO group. (C) IP showing the HMGN2 with (D) densitometric analysis showing the relative expression ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
Figure Legend Snippet: PYO up‐regulates HMGN2ac in macrophages. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 50 μM PYO or DMSO for 6 h, and TSA (50 nM) was used as a positive control for HMGN2ac.
Techniques Used: Positive Control, Expressing, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Mass Spectrometry, Modification, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of HMGN2ac on the PYO‐mediated autophagy in the RAW 264.7 cells. The WT and KO RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 50 μM PYO or DMSO for 6 h. (A) Western blot showing LC3B II protein in the RAW 264.7 cells with or without Hmgn2 −/− upon PYO (50 μM, 6 h) or DMSO treatment, and (B) densitometric analysis showing relative expression normalized to that of the DMSO group. (C) Confocal microscopy images displaying the amount of intracellular LC3B puncta (green fluorescence, 630x) with or without Hmgn2 −/− upon PYO (50 μM, 6 h) or DMSO treatment. The nucleus was stained by DAPI (blue fluorescence, 630x), scale bar = 5 μm. (D, F) KO RAW 264.7 cells were transfected, respectively, with the GFP, 2K‐R, 3K‐R, 5K‐R and WT HMGN2 plasmids using jetPRIME for 24 h and then incubated both with 50 μM PYO and with DMSO for 6 h. The Western blot analysis showing the LC3B II protein. (E, G) Densitometric analysis showing relative expression normalized to that of the GFP plasmid. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, * P < 0.05, and n.s indicates no statistical difference, n = 3
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Expressing, Confocal Microscopy, Fluorescence, Staining, Transfection, Incubation, Plasmid Preparation
Figure Legend Snippet: HMGN2ac might have no interaction with H3K27ac. The KO RAW 264.7 cells were transfected, respectively, with GFP, 2K‐R, 3K‐R, 5K‐R and WT HMGN2 plasmids by using jetPRIME, for 24 h, and then incubated with both 50 μM PYO and DMSO for 6 h. The Western blot showing H3K27ac in RAW 264.7 cells treated both with DMSO (A) and with PYO (C), and (B, D) the densitometric analysis showing relative expression normalized by the GFP plasmid. (E) Western blot showing HMGN2 protein in the RAW 264.7 cells both with and without TSA (20 nM) upon PYO stimulation, and (F) densitometric analysis showing relative expression normalized to that of the DMSO group. (G) RT‐qPCR displaying the Hmgn2 mRNA in the RAW 264.7 cells treated with PYO (50 μM, 6 h), and DMSO is the control. (H‐I) Co‐IP showing the interaction of HMGN2 with H3K27ac. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, *** P < 0.001, and n.s indicates no statistical difference, n = 3
Techniques Used: Transfection, Incubation, Western Blot, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: HMGN2ac and H3K27ac regulate Ulk1 transcription during autophagy. Western blot showing p‐ULK1 and ULK1 in RAW 264.7 cells (A) and PM cells (C) treated with 50 μM PYO at indicated time‐points, and (B, D) densitometric analysis showing relative expression normalized by the DMSO group. (E) RT‐qPCR analysis showing the relative Ulk1 mRNA level in the RAW 264.7 cells treated both with and without TSA (20 nM) upon PYO (50 μM, 6 h) stimulation. (F) The KO RAW 264.7 cells were transfected, respectively, with GFP, 5K‐R and WT HMGN2 plasmids by using jetPRIME for 24 h and then incubated both with 50 μM PYO and with DMSO for 6 h. RT‐qPCR showing the relative Ulk1 mRNA. (G) The schematic diagram depicting primer amplification sites in ChIP‐qPCR. TSS, transcription start site; −855 to −692, area of promoter region for primer designing. (H) ChIP‐qPCR showing the H3K27ac recruitment at the Ulk1 promoter in the RAW 264.7 cells treated both with and without TSA (20 nM) upon PYO (50 μM, 6 h) stimulation. (I, J) The KO RAW 264.7 cells were transfected respectively with GFP, 5K‐R, and WT HMGN2 plasmids by using jetPRIME for 24 h, then the cells were treated both with 50 μM PYO and with DMSO for 6 h. The ChIP‐qPCR analysis showing the HMGN2ac recruitment at the Ulk1 gene promoter. Data are expressed as mean ±SD, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001, and n.s indicates no statistical difference, n = 3
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection, Incubation, Amplification, ChIP-qPCR

